Short answer. “Video interview” or “assessment” is not itself a legal category. The relevant questions are whether the system uses the covered computational techniques, produces a simplified output and how that output is relied on in a hiring or promotion decision.

Examples that may require analysis

Human review does not automatically remove scope

A recruiter watching the interview or seeing the assessment results does not necessarily take the tool outside LL144. Under §5-300, the issue is how the automated output is actually used relative to other decision criteria.

Audit-path questions

The audit methodology can differ depending on whether the system produces a continuous score, selection decision or classification. The output semantics must therefore be established before calculations begin.

What evidence is useful for scoping

Last legally reviewed: September 27, 2026.